UDI/Ontario Issue Update

For immediate release

April 22, 2005

Bill 60 Passes Third Reading

  
On April 19, 2005, the Ontario legislature gave third reading to Bill 60, An Act to amend the Ontario Heritage Act, which makes comprehensive amendments to the Ontario Heritage Act.  The Bill will come into force on Royal Assent, which has not yet occurred.

A redlined copy of the Bill, as amended by Standing Committee on Justice Policy, can be accessed at www.ontla.on.ca/documents/Bills/38_Parliament/Session1/b060rep.pdf.

On December 1, 2004, UDI/Ontario made a presentation to the Ontario Legislative Assembly Standing Committee on Justice Policy Regarding Bill 60, which can be accessed on this website - please click here to view PDF

Bill 60 contains a number of changes that affect private landowners rights.

1. Demolition of Municipally Designated Heritage Property

Under the current Ontario Heritage Act;

  • If the owner of a designated property applies to the municipality to demolish a designated property and the municipality refuses the application, the effect of the refusal is only to delay the demolition by 180 days, provided a building permit for a new structure had been obtained.

Under Bill 60;

  • Municipalities will now have the power to prohibit the demolition of property designated by the municipality. The owner of a designated property, that is refused a demolition permit, is allowed to appeal the refusal to the Ontario Municipal Board. If that appeal is refused, the applicant will have no recourse, and no demolition can occur.

  • Criteria do not currently exist for the OMB to judge the heritage value of a designated property.
     

2. Heritage Designation

Under the current Ontario Heritage Act;

  • Landowners may challenge a proposed by-law designating their property, which objection is examined by the Review Board. The Review Board then in turn issues a report, with recommendations, to council. Very few landowners challenged a designating by-law, primarily because the final decision of the Review Board was not binding on council and the Review Board process simply delayed the expiry of the 180-day delay.

Under Bill 60;

  • Landowners may still challenge a proposed by-law designating their property. Due to the changes to the Act, landowners may be more interested in challenging designations before the Review Board, especially where the municipality is attempting to designate a building with little heritage value. There will be a whole new set of strategic considerations for a landowner to make in respect of the Review Board process, whereas the Review Board was often ignored in the past.
     

3. Maintenance and Repair of Heritage Property

Under the current Ontario Heritage Act;

  • There is no obligation on the landowner of a designated heritage property to maintain or keep the property in good repair.

Under Bill 60;

  • Municipalities have been given the power to make by-laws establishing standards for the maintenance and repair of the heritage attributes of property designated by the municipality or by the Minister.

  • It is unclear what standards will apply and if the municipality will have the power to impose significantly higher standards than those applicable to other types of property.

  • Municipalities might also attempt to use their new powers respecting the maintenance and repair of heritage buildings in order to secure the actual restoration of such buildings, which could involve significant costs for the landowner.

Other changes include:

  • Changed process for designation and de-designation;

  • The Minister of Culture has been given powers to designate heritage property of provincial significance; and

  • Increase protection for heritage conservation districts and significant marine heritage sites.
     

To obtain more information concerning this Issue Update, please contact Neil Rodgers, President
or Jessica Annis, Senior Policy Advisor, Urban Development Institute/Ontario at (416) 498-9121.

  ïBACK | ñTOP | INDEX | PRINT